Eloise's picture

zarathustra wrote:

zarathustra wrote:

Is there some objective method for determining what parts of the bible to take literally, and what allegorically?

Yeah there is. Objectively, the recording or telling of any historical event in any language in probably all times, has been laced with allegory, rhetoric, bias and comment. Literature is by nature whether it be historical, scientific or fictional ~ imaginative, embellished, encoded and colloquial.

So how to tell which parts to view in an allegorical sense is easy. All of it. It's all in some way analogously but not literally related to our present world, written by thinking people of an ancient world.

 

zarathustra wrote:

Are we free to take the gospels allegorically (as they likewise conflict with one another, just like the creation stories)?

Consider, if someone was to find the writings on this site in a couple of millennia and read through them to find discontinuity between your thoughts and the thoughts of one of your fellow atheists and come to the conclusion that you, neither, based anything you had to say in real experience because you contradicted each other, what would you have to say to them? There is your answer.

zarathustra wrote:

After all, the gospels "are obviously at odds with what we now know scientifically": Virgins don't have babies, and men don't rise from the dead.

I'm sure in a couple thousand years people will say the same about the limits of our knowledge. But you'd still hope that our better half of wisdom could stand the test of time, right?

Theist badge qualifier : Gnostic/Philosophical Panentheist


"No creation story is a myth to the people who tell it. It’s just the story."
"The law itself is beyond argument. It’s there, plainly in place in the community of life. What the takers will deny is that it applies to mankind."
Daniel Quinn - Ishmael

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <span> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <map> <area> <hr> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <tr> <td> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong> <font> <del> <ins> <sub> <sup> <quote> <blockquote> <pre> <address> <code> <cite> <embed> <obj
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text, URLs will automatically be converted to links.

More information about formatting options