V1per41 wrote:IMO, Having

V1per41 wrote:

IMO, Having "under god" in the pledge and "In god we trust" on the currency is very obviously unconstitutional.  I'm not sure how anyone can make a good argument that they should stay.  We all know that they should be removed, and that they never should have been implemented in the first place.

 

...That being said.  This topic is far from the top of my list of things we should be focusing our attention and resources on.  There are far worse things that religion is doing to our country and our planet that needs to be solved before we go to court over something that doesn't really have a direct effect on us.

I agree. If anything, such an event might hurt this intellectual movement because of the very easily angered fundamental Americans. Smiling I don't think America is ready for this yet!

As I said in the title of this topic, I was just curious.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <span> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <map> <area> <hr> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <tr> <td> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong> <font> <del> <ins> <sub> <sup> <quote> <blockquote> <pre> <address> <code> <cite> <embed> <obj
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text, URLs will automatically be converted to links.

More information about formatting options