User login
Navigation
Next Show!
4 hours 48 minutes until the next show!
Kelly, Rook, and Sapient blog
- Car Vandalized Over Darwin Fish
- Presentation in NYC, August 10
- Sapient and Explorologist reach a settlement agreement
- Atheist Nexus Controversy?
- PZ Myers, "Wafergate", and Christian Ignorance
- Do The Gospels Contradict Each Other?
- No More Abortions in South Dakota?
- Atheism and Autism--Are They Correlated?
- Serotonin linked to religiosity
- Wanna See Me Naked?
- Vox Day - Where Did I Say I Was Finished?
- How many of you play golf? (and my own brief golf story)
- Mythicism, Minimalism, and it's Detractors
The Atheist Response
MargaretDowney.com
Copyright Rational Response Squad 2006-2008.
IMO, Having "under god" in
IMO, Having "under god" in the pledge and "In god we trust" on the currency is very obviously unconstitutional. I'm not sure how anyone can make a good argument that they should stay. We all know that they should be removed, and that they never should have been implemented in the first place.
...That being said. This topic is far from the top of my list of things we should be focusing our attention and resources on. There are far worse things that religion is doing to our country and our planet that needs to be solved before we go to court over something that doesn't really have a direct effect on us.
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan