Submitted by HisWillness on April 17, 2008 - 7:56am.
Vox wrote:
Perhaps Kelly should ask Richard Dawkins which he believes is more in danger. I'm quite confident he has far more fear for his Enlightenment values than he does for science. In fact, if she thinks about it, she might even realize why evolutionary biologists are so much more concerned about threats to their "science" than are astrophysicists, economists, or any scientists in any other field.
I can't let this one go. Biology is a "science" (quotes for diminuation), but economists are "scientists"? He must be joking. And maybe biologists are more worried than those guys because people actually support wacky-ass theories that make no sense, like, oh ... say, "intelligent design".
This guy is unbelievable. I'm so glad you didn't buy his book.
Vox wrote:Perhaps Kelly
I can't let this one go. Biology is a "science" (quotes for diminuation), but economists are "scientists"? He must be joking. And maybe biologists are more worried than those guys because people actually support wacky-ass theories that make no sense, like, oh ... say, "intelligent design".
This guy is unbelievable. I'm so glad you didn't buy his book.
Will: no gyration without funkstification.