Hello !

I want to show you a nice principle of speaking(thinking) for uncovering the truth about one's toughts, more precisely to discover the origin of one's toughts if they originate from truth or from lie.

You must be carefull in constructing the logic of your toughts first. Exemple:

Can those afirmations be wrong ?

"The human mind belongs to correctness(logic), not god.", "Correctnes(logic) is the master of the human mind, not god"

Be carefull in analysing those sentances, wrong means the opposite of correct so how can those afirmations be wrong since I've reffered to the importance of correctness (importance of logic) ? Simply, I couldn't be wrong even if I've wanted to !

So, if you construct your toughts like this and see someone that tries to be against you, it's clear that he/she can't be right no mather what he/she tries to explain to you. This means that if you see some religious persone trying to contradic you, automaticlly you know it's all bullshit ! Can't be right(truth), logic does not speak against it's self ! Only something that truth is not (definition of lie) tries to speak against truth !

So, if you belive in God, and you want to see if God is truth or lie you could in theory develope a system of toughts to test this ! You could in theory have the means of seeing if this "thing" called God really exists or if it exists only in our minds and not in the real world. If you see that for beliveing in God you must speak against the importance of truth, correct, logic, than it's clear that you're trying to make something that truth, corect, logic is not, to be in your believe. Basically you're trying to foll yourself !