Submitted by Hambydammit on January 26, 2008 - 2:43pm.
Quote:
You are coming from the assumption that the brain (matter) produces though.
No. I'm observing that the very definitions of intelligence and thought are entirely dependent on matter. If you are to propose something else, you must define it.
Quote:
And why do you assume that this consciousness would be intelligence, entity or being? It could also be pure consciousness without personality.
Pardon me. I mean to make no assumptions.
Now, will you please answer my question? What difference does it make whether there was a pre-bang entity? You are still under the obligation to prove such an entity's current existence.
If superior creatures from space ever visit earth, the first question they will ask, in order to assess the level of our civilization, is: 'Have they discovered evolution yet?' -- Richard Dawkins
Quote: You are coming from
No. I'm observing that the very definitions of intelligence and thought are entirely dependent on matter. If you are to propose something else, you must define it.
Pardon me. I mean to make no assumptions.
Now, will you please answer my question? What difference does it make whether there was a pre-bang entity? You are still under the obligation to prove such an entity's current existence.
If superior creatures from space ever visit earth, the first question they will ask, in order to assess the level of our civilization, is: 'Have they discovered evolution yet?' -- Richard Dawkins