Clockcat... question, plz.

Kapkao's picture

ClockCat wrote:
Doomy prefers those that enjoy close combat over ranged weaponry, and only respects strength and martial prowess.

  1. What sort of Martial Prowess are we talking about here? Taekwondo? Ninjitsu? Kung-Fu? Bushido? Fisticuffs? Kick-Boxing? Wrestling? Fencing? Choke-Hold? Boxer Rebellion-ism? Chinese Triad? Yakuza? Testudo Formation? Phalanx Formation?

I need something to strive towards in my (nearly unlimited) spare time........

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

The Doomed Soul's picture

Kapkao wrote: Taekwondo?

Kapkao wrote:

 Taekwondo? Ninjitsu? Kung-Fu? Bushido? Fisticuffs? Kick-Boxing? Wrestling? Fencing? Choke-Hold? Boxer Rebellion-ism? Chinese Triad? Yakuza? Testudo Formation? Phalanx Formation?

Yes...

 

 

... but you still dont stand a chance with me, in the ring, on the street, or under the covers...

 

What Would Kharn Do?

Kapkao's picture

The Doomed Soul wrote:...

The Doomed Soul wrote:

... but you still dont stand a chance with me, in the ring, on the street, or under the covers...

 

It wasn't my intent to stand a chance against you! Indeed, I hope you (or someone like you) defeat me quite brutally every night  <--- as close as I could find to a shit-eating grin

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

iwbiek's picture

The Doomed Soul wrote:Kapkao

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Kapkao wrote:

 Taekwondo? Ninjitsu? Kung-Fu? Bushido? Fisticuffs? Kick-Boxing? Wrestling? Fencing? Choke-Hold? Boxer Rebellion-ism? Chinese Triad? Yakuza? Testudo Formation? Phalanx Formation?

Yes...

 

 

... but you still dont stand a chance with me, in the ring, on the street, or under the covers...

 

 

so, doomy...do you even have a fuckin' gender?  i always assumed you congealed out of molten rock or something...

"I asked my father,
I said, 'Father change my name.'
The one I'm using now it's covered up
with fear and filth and cowardice and shame."
--Leonard Cohen

Kapkao's picture

an unwelcome guest?

iwbiek wrote:

 

so, doomy...do you even have a fuckin' gender?  i always assumed you congealed out of molten rock or something...

Hey look... I think it's time for Dawson's Creek/Friends/Felicity/Melrose Place/Ally McBeal/Sex and the City on syndicated TV! Let's go watch it! After you, Biwbiek!

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

iwbiek's picture

Kapkao wrote:iwbiek

Kapkao wrote:

iwbiek wrote:


 

so, doomy...do you even have a fuckin' gender?  i always assumed you congealed out of molten rock or something...

Hey look... I think it's time for Dawson's Creek/Friends/Felicity/Melrose Place/Sex and the City on syndicated TV! Let's go watch it! After you, Biwbiek!

 

wow.  you lack coherence, you're extremely adept at caps and bold-face, you alter the sizes and colors of your fonts, you love embedding high-larious images, and your skill with emoticons is peerless: no fuckin' way you're a huge mediocrity!  "hey, i'll go online and type shit only i will be able to understand the intricate subtleties of!  i'll even alter someone's name with a single letter, thus calling their sexuality into question!  no way that's sophomoric!  it'll be clear to everyone that i'm a fuckin' genius!" 

"I asked my father,
I said, 'Father change my name.'
The one I'm using now it's covered up
with fear and filth and cowardice and shame."
--Leonard Cohen

Kapkao's picture

Aw, you poor thing!

iwbiek wrote:


wow.  you lack coherence, you're extremely adept at caps and bold-face, you alter the sizes and colors of your fonts, you love embedding high-larious images, and your skill with emoticons is peerless: no fuckin' way you're a huge mediocrity!  "hey, i'll go online and type shit only i will be able to understand the intricate subtleties of!  i'll even alter someone's name with a single letter, thus calling their sexuality into question!  no way that's sophomoric!  it'll be clear to everyone that i'm a fuckin' genius!" 

"My genius is even more abundant when I go places I'm not wanted. Y'know, like some tick-infested, homeless, starved-for-attention canine...."

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

iwbiek's picture

Kapkao wrote:iwbiek

Kapkao wrote:

iwbiek wrote:


 

wow.  you lack coherence, you're extremely adept at caps and bold-face, you alter the sizes and colors of your fonts, you love embedding high-larious images, and your skill with emoticons is peerless: no fuckin' way you're a huge mediocrity!  "hey, i'll go online and type shit only i will be able to understand the intricate subtleties of!  i'll even alter someone's name with a single letter, thus calling their sexuality into question!  no way that's sophomoric!  it'll be clear to everyone that i'm a fuckin' genius!" 

"My genius is even more abundant when I go places I'm not wanted. Y'know, like some tick-infested, homeless, starved-for-attention canine...."

 

i believe i addressed doomy to begin with.  let's ask ourselves who started the fuckin' exchange to begin with and what implications that holds for the idea of the starved-for-attention canine.

 

"I asked my father,
I said, 'Father change my name.'
The one I'm using now it's covered up
with fear and filth and cowardice and shame."
--Leonard Cohen

Kapkao's picture

iwbiek wrote:i believe i

iwbiek wrote:


i believe i addressed doomy to begin with.  let's ask ourselves who started the fuckin' exchange to begin with and what implications that holds for the idea of the starved-for-attention canine

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Kapkao's picture

(No subject)

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

iwbiek's picture

mm-hm.

mm-hm.

Kapkao's picture

Glutton for punishment, eh?

iwbiek wrote:

mm-hm.

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Kapkao's picture

I have no life! (but I come by it honestly)

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)