A Molecular Geneticist proves hovind is an idiot

Added: May 21, 2007 From: thewayofgrowingpains Ouch! Category News & Politics
| Tags: | thewayofthemaster Kent Hovind Evolution Genetics Biochemistry Creation Creationism Kirk Cameron Ray Comfort |
§§That fact that you cannot prove the nonexistence of a thing called god is inconsequential and nugatory because nonexistence cannot be proven of anything.§§

































The painful defeat of Kent Hovind
Okay, so this entire movie is all about how a molecular biologist interrupts and tries to corner Hovind into answering a question, not about science, but about how he plans to commericalize his beliefs. In other words how can he earn tax money? If a person believes in God and wants to prove He exists I doubt he is going to concern himself with how his findings can bring in a little cash. Maybe that's the problem with evolution, it focuses on how to bring in grant money instead of actual science, but then again it isn't science anyway so that's probably why.
Just a theist here with questions, comments, and arguments trying to see if this place is worth the title it claims or if it is just nonsense.
Richard333 wrote: Okay, so
His point was that science tends to have commercial applications... or applications in general.
The Intelligent Design/Creation Science lobbies distance themselves from theology, actually, since they want theirs to be considered a scientific field.
So... can you answer the guy's question? In case you missed it: If Creationism/Intelligent Design is a science, what predictions does it make (future discoveries that can specifically validate it) and what applications does it have? Forget about commerce, since you seem hung up on that. How do we use it?
Richard333 wrote: Okay, so
How exactly is evolution not science? It makes predictions such as there will be transitional forms(which we have found). It is falsifible (if you could find a truly irreducible thing that couldn't have come about by gradual step by step evolution you would falsify evolution). So please do explain how it is not science.
Richard333 wrote: Okay, so
Richard333 is a dipshit. Here are his emails to us through our contact form (which has the disclaimer that they made be public). Look as Richard makes an utter fool of himself, and wasn't worthy of much more of a response than this link and an IP ban.
1 minute later....
LOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSEEEEERRR
He's not the man he wants you to think he is. Go to The Real John McCain to learn about the double talk express. View these videos about John McCain to learn about the flip-flopping double talker. Help me get rid of a transferable credit with Southwest Airlines and you'll save $90!
Well it looks like another
Well it looks like another total idiot who won't listen to any actual logic gone from the forums *invisible tear rolls don cheek*
Although i still wanna here how exactly evolution isn't science that would be a hoot.
zntneo
I want to hear that, too. I'm sure the thousands of working biologists are interested in how their experiments and genetic findings are useless even though they've revolutionized everything.
__| ]2 U ]{ /\__]\[ /\ ]\/[ | ]\[ () ]2 |__